Before you start criticizing my choices, I'm going to make a statement: the fact that I am homosexual is in no way an indication that I am a pedophile. I have not yet nor will I ever engage in sexual relations with a student. Now ask yourself a few questions. What do you know of prophecy? Have you seen the will of Lily and James Potter? Do wizards even have wills? Ask yourself another question: who the hell are you, a mere muggle, to discuss the intricacies of wizarding politics? Does mispronouncing a name make you clever, or does it make you childish? Is there any evidence whatsoever that I ever invaded the mind of a student?
I have been acused of "testing" Harry in his first year, of placing insufficient defenses around the philosophers stone. My defense was more than sufficient. Had Mr. Potter not attempted to defend the stone, it would have remained safely within the mirror. I left no clues for Mr. Potter. I actively discouraged the boy from entering the 3rd floor corridor.
People have asked why I did not "deal with" the basilisk in my school. I must wonder why I was expected to locate a secret which had remained hidden for a thousand years. To indicate that a failure to do so is an instance of incompetence is a drastic error of judgment.
It has been asked why I did not defend Sirius Black. He was caught redhanded at the end of a war. I had no reason to believe in his innocence, and it was not unreasonable to assume that he had received a trial.
People wonder why I let Dementors onto the grounds of my school. I did not let them; they were forced upon me by the ministry of magic. Though I could have utilized my considerable magical power to drive them away, it would have been illegal to do so.
People have wondered how I allowed Harry Potter to compete in the Triwizard tournament. Again, it was not my choice.
It has been asked why I sent Severus Snape to teach Mr. Potter. That may have been an error on my part. I assumed that Snape, an occlumens talented and powerful enough to resist Lord Voldemort himself would be capable of instilling a modicum of skill in the art upon Mr. Potter.
One more question: have you ever killed wizard-Hitler? Motherfucking. WIZARD. HITLER. No. No you have not. Where the FUCK do you get off calling me evil?
AN: yes, evil Dumbledore can be mildly amusing, yes I know that this is fan fiction, and authors are entitled to make shit up, and some of the best stories are ones only very loosely based on cannon. This invalidates nothing that I've said.