This is just some of my responses to the Harry Potter vs. Twilight debate.
I own nothing!
Pattinson, can you say HOT? And he's totally sexy when he sparkles!
Two reasons why this is so wrong, 1. He is in Harry Potter too and frankly he is better looking without all the contacts and make-up he had to wear. He has even said that he preferred his role as Cedric Diggory and Hated playing Edward. 2. You are talking about the BOOK not the movie, besides the Harry Potter cast doesn't need to be hot, they have talent.
Lautner, I mean, have you SEEN those muscles?
Again looks don't matter, besides this is the BOOK we are talking about.
Stewart. An extremely talented and beautiful actress, with loads of potential
How? She displays no emotion and her voice is as deep as a guy's. Besides see the above reason.
4. The Volturi. REALISTIC villains, instead of insane freaks in cloaks, like Voldemort and the Death Eaters.
Um, which is more realistic; racial maniacs or sparkly people who sit on thrones and talk their problems out. Have you ever heard of the Jim Crow trials? Another thing is that EVERYONE in the Harry Potter world wears capes, so it is normal for the villains to be wearing them.
5. Because its just common sence to like twilight! Haha. Romance means everything. Bella and Edward are like, MENT 4 each other, and everything is just...PERFECT! In Harry potter, u would that that harry and harmonie would like...fall in love or something...and then u watch people die in freaky ways, and then there are creepy things...GAHH! but yea. (:
Can anyone truly understand what this is supposed to mean? Anyway I THINK that whoever wrote this is trying to convey the message that Twilight is better because of the little romance that goes on in their perfect Mary-sue world with all of the perfect Mary-sues. Real life does not all ways work out perfectly and people die, Rowling understands this so in order to be realistic some characters have to die. By all the dying and "Creepy things" she builds suspense and a true emotional response.
6. Because it's one of the greatest love stories ever! Harry Potter is good too, but Twilight has way more romance and more hot guys...EDWARD, JASPER, EMMETT, CARLISLE! Need I say more!
What happened to it's on the inside that counts? The Harry Potter characters don't need to be hot, they have good character and are (for the good guys) have good hearts. Besides I can think of no other story with more love. Parental love when Harry's parents die to save him (Bella may want her daughter to live but the whole time her baby's father is trying to convince Bella to kill it) and Molly who will do anything for her children. There is also romantic love, Harry and Ginny are one example.
7. Yes, we all know that Harry Potter and Twilight are both fiction, but Twilight is clearly better. When I read a book, I like to imagine myself in the plot or relate to the story somewhat. Aside from the vampire theme, Twilight actually takes place in a REAL town with up to date things. ex) cars, school, etc. I'm sorry but I just can't picture myself on a flying train, eating chocolate covered frogs, headed to a non existent magical school. In my opinion, Twilight is obviously better.
Harry Potter is FICTION and it is not Rowling's fault that you have an unusually small imagination. Harry Potter is all about creativity and letting your imagination explore.
8. OMGGG Harry POtter is messed up. Like seriusly, he needs to grow up and stop being so boring cuz edward is like waaaaaaay more AMAZINNNG. therees no love in hary potter and nobodies hot who wants to read a book without hot peeps?
Who cares if a BOOK has "hot peeps" in it you can just imagine the characters as hot. And who said no one in Harry Potter is hot? Harry is supposed to look almost just like his father who was said to be one of the hottest boys in school. How is Harry boring? Just try to answer that question.
9. Each book in the twilight series has a different story line. It is mainly about Bella's Lovestory but in the 1st book it was about how Edward had to save Bella and in each book the story changes. The main reason of the book is for Bella To become A vampire. Then after that it is the story with Renesmee. In Harry Potter it takes 7 or 8 books to get to the point. Killing the one who must not be named. it drags on and on and becomes boring.
Really? Harry Potter is a PLOT DRIVEN story. While Twilight is just about Bella and Edward being in love Harry Potter has so many different conflicts and twists. It takes seven books because of how rich the plot is.
10. Twilight has a more reasonable plot than HarryPotter. Look at Harry and you'll see he's more angsty than Bella. And all the Harry Potter books are like Harry being "My life sucks" and then Voldemort shows up and he's like "I'm going to kill you" and Harry's all like "No way" and then Harry wins in the end. It's way obvious, especially when the author already tells you how many books there's going to be. I mean, why can't we live in total suspense on what's going to happen next? Twilight gives that suspense that something amazing is going to happen that Harry Potter never gave us. Plus, Harry Potter is a wizard and wizards are demonic creatures. Who would want to root for a demon as the good guys? In twilight, everyone's a vampire, and vampires aren't Satan's spawn.
Have you even read either book? In Twilight Edward practically says he is a demonic creature, he says he has no soul and is unnatural. Plus look at the answer to number 9.