I decided to do this randomly, no idea why though. There will be ten of the letters in each one except for the last one, because the last letter gets it's own chapter. Enjoy!
Dear Director,
I want to thank you in advance for your openness to our subcommittee's request for more information. We were disappointed that your recovery force reported a total loss at outpost 17B. We had hoped there would be at least one soldier left that could shed some light one the situation. I know that your agency has enjoyed a high degree of freedom with very little scrutiny in the past few years. It is not our intention to disrupt such a progressive military program, but instead to find a way we can work together in a manner that fits all our responsibilities. I am certain that you will agree. And we look foreword to making this review process as painless as we possibly can.
...
Dear Chairman,
While I am obligated to assist your investigation I ask that you not waste my time with irrelevant questions. My agency is normally unconcerned with such minor directives as troop reassignments. Except of course, in the most critical of matters.
...
Dear Director,
Due to your busy schedule we have begun interviewing members of your staff. I am certain you will let us know if this bothers you. Our debriefings keep coming back to a single subject at outpost 17B. Can you explain to us what this 'Meta' is and what your plans are to deal with it?
...
Dear Chairmen,
Rest assured we have the situation under control. While the Meta is proving to be an illusive enemy, our recovery agent is already closing in on it. I expect this insinuate will reach a conclusion soon, and I will be able to return to my research. Hopefully, without further interruption.
...
Dear Director,
We can all understand that a shift from autonomy to oversight can be a difficult adjustment for anyone, but especially someone of your standing. In that spirit, we have attempted to accommodate to your brief explanation to our serious inquiry. None the less, I feel compelled to inform you that even our trust has its limits...
Dear Chairmen,
The Meta is nothing more than an entity seeking to increase its power. In these confusing days after the war, from my perspective, that seems to be a very common occurrence at the moment.
Dear Director,
Your program was granted the use of a single Artificial Intelligence unit for implantation experiments. Yet, the department records clearly show multiple agents in the field with implants during the same timeframes, surely this must be a logging error. And we anticipate a corrected document soon.
Dear Chairmen,
I understand you concern that increased activity would bring increased risk. However, our failsafes are simple but foolproof. A dead or dying agent's beacon automatically notifies our recovery team. And we will be on the scene immediately, to secure all the military's property.
Dear Director,
I feel you're avoiding the question, if this target was already in possession of an AI unit how was he able to secure an additional unit from agent South? Would not that verify, as we indicated earlier, that your program now runs experiments with more than one Artificial Intelligence? If so, where did this additional AI come from? And more importantly, how did your agency procure them?
Dear Chairmen,
Our records in this matter are impeccable, and I will refer you to them. It is true that we were granted the use of only one AI program, yet with special permission to conduct our experiments that is all we were allowed to do, and that is all we have done. Of course, I am sure that you will agree that the core mission of any scientific endeavor is to find solutions to unexpected problems.