Nightmare #2


Existence.

When you saw the Kyuubi no Yoko there was no fear. Many would think they experience fear when looking at the beast. But they know nothing of fear.

You experience „fear" when thinking about hell. But in hell you dont feel fear.

In hell, you experience agony.

There is no hell.

We made hell, so we have a definite reason to do the right thing.

Fear isn't when you stand before something that is threating your body or anything that belongs to you. You feel fear when you know you can do nothing about it. You feel fear when you absolutely know, it will happen. The people feel at peace when they know something comes to an end and the topic is closed forever.

That, is fear.

First, fear is not something bad. Our mind makes our body feel fear to survive longer.

Fear is when you know something, but you dont want this fact to be true. Your mind says only: „I hope it isnt true", voila, fear.

That brings me to the original topic.

You feel fear when you ask yourself: „Why is anything?" If you think about it, it seems completely illogical that there is anything. There was nothing, why is there anything now?

That is a thought a human mind cannot comprehend when its overridden by pure fear.

Because there would be an answer like: „There still is nothing" that would bring us to the logial conclusion: „We are not"

Our mind doesnt want to accept that. This is the first wall that separates us from being on par with a entity we call „god".

The second barrier is the most logical of them all.

Causality. Many people think our potential is blocked, because we have to follow the rules of causality. That is true and not true at the same time.

We exist, because the source of everything isnt something that was caused; thats why we cannot comprehend it. But we live, because we can foresee what we will do, need and want.

Because of causality, we know that we will be hungry sooner or later. What do we do? We go get something to eat so when we get hungry, everything will be prepared already.

Isnt that comfortable?

We can see into destiny and into the past using just that, causality. Fate, destiny and karma.

Of course that all exist; its nothing but a synonyme for what will happen.

Thats why there are those things: causality. Everything that could possibly be foreseen, which is propably everything but the becoming of existence, is destiny. And it functions the other way around too. If there is a plate with food, you know something prepared the food. That did happen. If you see a baby, you know the baby resided nine months within the womb of a woman – lets hope it for the baby that it did and is not an experiment or anything like it.

Our mind is bound to causality from the very beginning, because causality is so comfortable.

Lets apply the concept of „causality".

You are writing something. Are you writing something?

There begins it. The question states beyond thousand things before we come to the original meaning. Are you writing something? And now we apply.

Are you? Yes

Is there more? Yes

Do you have substance? Yes

Can you control your substance? Yes

Are you moving? Yes

Do you have anything to grab something? Yes

Are you comunicating somehow? Yes

Are you leaving marks somehow? Yes

Are you writing? Yes.

Of course i am not done, but thats just an example how comfortable that is.

We give us answers just like that.

There are no definite answers.

Thats what i am trying to say.

a + a = a

or

something + something = something

Thats not an answer, thats a fact.

A rule.

Causality.

„Something + Something" IS WITHOUT EXCEPTION „Something"

Very comfortable.

Foolish.

There are no answers.

Can you really give an answer to: „Are you?"

Sokrates answered: „As long as i think, i will be."

Thats where our mind ends. That is the strongest barrier. Its so big and powerful that we arent seeing the forest for the trees.

Our mind relies on causality. But causality does NOT exist.

Like i said, at the beginning there was nothing.

Something + Something = Something

or

Nothing + Nothing = Nothing -- BUT WE ARE.

Thats where our causality ends, our mind blanks out and we invent god.

God is comfortable.

Causality is comfortable too, but it does not exist.

Because god is „Something"... wrong.

Nothing + Nothing IS NOT Something.

So there cannot be god. We cannot be.

Our mind blanks out, we cant comprehend what the meaning behind the sentence is and the one reading this right now is nodding dumbly.

The answer to a question is the question itself. a + a = a.

If the question is „a" the answer is too, „a".

Causality says: a+a = 2a

But causality does not exist.

There is the answer and the question.

They are the same. There are no definite answers, so you have to answer yourself without giving an answer, because it would be wrong. You answer the question „Are you writing" with the equivalent.

That, ladies and gentlemen, is a rule of balance.

The only definite answer is the question, because it means just that, what is in mind. Any other human would think something other of it.

There are no definite answers.

But this is an answer in itself.

Thats where the contradiction begins.

There is an exception to the rule of „There are no definite answers".

The exception is the rule itself. It is an answer without a question.

A/N Yes thats right. I really am believing what i wrote and yes, I came up with it on the spot.