I've noticed that in some stories people review like this: "ZOMIGOD!! THAT WAS THE WIKED! LOVED IT!! AWESOME!! YEAH! PRAISE!! WORSHIP!! YEAH!! UPDATE BIOTCH!!! YEAH!!!" But, when I read it (Because I check reviews to see if it might be good…) the lay-out was crappy, the grammar, spelling, and general plot is pretty bad too, and it was repetitive (ex. He said, she said, Bob said, Sally said. I.E. other words for said.) Is this because there are much worse stories out there and you'd settle for that story in comparison to others?
On that note, I would like to know: is my story like that? I don't want cheers for plot, I want cheers for the all around work I put into the story. I know some story's are like… really bad, on fanfiction (though most aren't pegged for it and I think that's wrong) but with story's like mine, I think it's better then most stories (Given I'm DEFFINATELY not the best. I've read some absolutely wonderful stuff on here though sadly hasn't been given as many reviews as should be given because of bad summary's, etc.) If you have a bone to pick with my story, DEAR GOD TELLS ME! (But don't give shit on the plot. And don't give me shit in a review like: "OMI GOD…THAT WAS STUPID. YOU'RE STUPID DUH EVERYTHINGS STUPID!" and don't tell me what the fuck you thought was stupid about it. Then I can't fix it and…oh the tables have turned…who's the stupid one now? Hmmm?
So, answer me that Not that last question though. That question was rhetorical and well, I was kind of talking to myself there. (Or more of the imaginary jackass I made up in that whole "stupid" review. Lol.)
- Loves Vianna!?