Hello once more everyone!
Been a while since i've looked at this story type and now, i do believe i am ready to take it back into the light once more.
This will be a crossover of the following:
Fate Grand Order.
Blood C.
Elfen Lied.
Claymore.
Akame Ga Kill.
Highschool DXD.
My Hero Academia.
Youjo Senki.
Harry Potter.
Attack On Titan.
Kingdom Hearts.
Black Lagoon.
RWBY.
Devil May Cry.
Not, that is not to say many of these worlds will be HERE in this world but many characters and or enemies like the demons from DMC. For the most part worlds like Black Lagoon, RWBY, My Hero Academia and even Attack On Titan will have their "Worlds" transported to Xero's. For example, from Attack on Titan only the island of Paradis and Marely will appear. The same could be said for Black Lagoon where the city of Roanapur appearing.
However some worlds will already be fused together like Fate Grand Order, Youjo Senki and Akame Ga Kill that will appear in later chapters. But for others like Kingdom Hearts, Elfen Lied and Blood C, only main characters and their enemies appear for reasons that will be explained again, in later chapters. Taking a little break from Marvel for a bit, so yeah, there's that. I might add more later if i feel like i could handle it but we'll wait and see.
BUT...their will be some changes from cannon on some of the worlds like Rwby. If you want to know what it is, read more and find out.
So let's get this show on the road, as this speech will be kinda all over the place but will have a general idea of the main topic. So, i own nothing at al but my OC's.
So please read, review and "What the fuc-BOOM"
Prologue: Justice
Justice.
What is justice?
To many, justice is just behavior or treatment or in other words"a concern for justice, peace, and genuine respect for people". It could even be a judge or magistrate, in particular a judge of the Supreme Court of a country or state. If one were to look up what the word "Justice" meant, here is what they would get:
Justice, in its broadest sense, is the principle that people receive that which they deserve, with the interpretation of what then constitutes "deserving" being impacted upon by numerous fields, with many differing viewpoints and perspectives, including the concepts of moral correctness based on ethics, rationality, law, religion, equity and fairness. The state will sometimes endeavour to increase justice by operating courts and enforcing their rulings.
Consequently, the application of justice differs in every culture. Early theories of justice were set out by the Ancient Greek philosophers Plato in his work The Republic, and Aristotle in his Nicomachean Ethics. Throughout history various theories have been established. Advocates of divine command theory have said that justice issues from God. In the 1600s, philosophers such as John Locke said that justice derives from natural law. Social contract theory said that justice is derived from the mutual agreement of everyone. In the 1800s, utilitarian philosophers such as John Stuart Mill said that justice is based on the best outcomes for the greatest number of people. Theories of distributive justice study what is to be distributed, between whom they are to be distributed, and what is the proper distribution. Egalitarians have said that justice can only exist within the coordinates of equality. John Rawls used a social contract theory to say that justice, and especially distributive justice, is a form of fairness. Robert Nozick and others said that property rights, also within the realm of distributive justice and natural law, maximizes the overall wealth of an economic system. Theories of retributive justice say that wrongdoing should be punished to insure justice. The closely related restorative justice (also sometimes called "reparative justice") is an approach to justice that focuses on the needs of victims and offenders.
In his dialogue Republic, Plato uses Socrates to argue for justice that covers both the just person and the just City State. Justice is a proper, harmonious relationship between the warring parts of the person or city. Hence, Plato's definition of justice is that justice is the having and doing of what is one's own. A just man is a man in just the right place, doing his best and giving the precise equivalent of what he has received. This applies both at the individual level and at the universal level. A person's soul has three parts – reason, spirit and desire. Similarly, a city has three parts – Socrates uses the parable of the chariot to illustrate his point: a chariot works as a whole because the two horses' power is directed by the charioteer. Lovers of wisdom – philosophers, in one sense of the term – should rule because only they understand what is good. If one is ill, one goes to a medic rather than a farmer, because the medic is expert in the subject of health. Similarly, one should trust one's city to an expert in the subject of the good, not to a mere politician who tries to gain power by giving people what they want, rather than what's good for them. Socrates uses the parable of the ship to illustrate this point: the unjust city is like a ship in open ocean, crewed by a powerful but drunken captain (the common people), a group of untrustworthy advisors who try to manipulate the captain into giving them power over the ship's course (the politicians), and a navigator (the philosopher) who is the only one who knows how to get the ship to port. For Socrates, the only way the ship will reach its destination – the good – is if the navigator takes charge.
But let's be honest, who can say what true justice is?
Who can say what is right and what is wrong?
Who can say, it is alright to kill one person, while it's wrong to kill another?
Who can say if it's right to kill at all, even when you're very life in on the line?
Who can say what is defined as "Evil" and what is "Good"?
The answer to that question is simple:
Yourself.
Only we, the individual can really, truly decide what is right and what is wrong. Sure, rules and laws decide what is "right" by being put forward by those in power but it all really boils down to the individual person have our own opinions made by our own moral compass's.
Why, one could say a single person's belief could be right, while the rest of society is wrong. But of course, that person could be labeled as a criminal or in extreme cases, a villain. You can be one person's hero and to another, their villain. In this case, a person's moral compass, their compassion or drive to do the right thing can easily be over overrated by society's need to be right, otherwise the entire thing could fall apart.
That is another extreme case but sometimes, the wrong belief in "Justice" could be the pillar that holds a corrupt society up.
Many are naturally resistant to change for no other better reason, other then the fact change can be scary and to be fair, a new norm can be scary. But is that such a bad thing? To be afraid, that is?
For life to move forward, things must change, things must adapt.
A wise man once said:
"It is not the strongest of the species that survives, nor the most intelligent that survives. It is the one that is most adaptable to change."
That also includes even the meaning and worth that is "Justice" itself. For you see, justice has gone through many changes throughout the ages or more specifically, the meaning of justice and what it truly is. In a war, justice can hold different meanings for both sides.
In fact, justice and what it means can be different in each culture, country, religion, nation, tribe, group, organization and just pretty much between two groups of people. Since the dawn of time, people have fought over for various different reasons but three of the most common reason among them are this:
Justice.
Knowledge.
Ideals.
Three things that can be very similar and yet, very different at the same time. But for the most part, these three things are the building blocks of society, two pillars to be precise:
Law and Order.
These two things make up a society, for there must be order in order to safe guard the society in question. Law, is something that helps govern and guide the people, something that ensures their will be order within society, to make sure everything runs smoothly. But another thing that has been apart of human psychology and society, is the very thing that often brings society, crashing down to it's knee's.
Something that disregards laws, order and justice most of all.
Madness.
This name alone can mean many things, has been attached to many things and has destroyed more civilizations faster then invaders, plague, famine and even death itself. Madness is not even a psychically thing, yet it can inflict such a deadly effect on people. In a lot of ways, it was a sickness, that once it starts to infect you, it attaches itself to all those around you and destroy everyone in the end.
Madness is very contagious to the point if one goes mad, everyone else does. It was a cold hard fact the master of Chaldea had learned long ago, when he first began his mission to save humanity. However, when the Convergence happened, he had no idea what kind of madness the merging of not one world but several worlds to his own.
Or when his Chaldea suddenly finds itself in a world where several cities and groups suddenly appear in a seemly dead world, things will change. Lines will be made, alliances will be forged, enemies will be created and what it means to be human will be called into question. Along with what it means to be a Magus, a wizard or even mage.
But most of all, what justice truly is, will be called into question. Who is in the right and who is in the wrong?
Who should decide?
Who has the right to decide what justice truly is?
Well, i guess there is only one way to find out.
Done.
Okay, yep giving this another shot and yeah know, let's do this and see where it goes, eh?
Devil out!