Sorry this isn't a real chapter, but I got the following review from a Guest, and wanted to address it.
Review:
Gotta be honest, I hope it stops being a Lucius-Hermione pairing, because of the original rape. I also hope you more fully address her feelings that it was "her fault" (for running away) because that's a very dangerous mindset for any rape victim to be in. Given that Madam Pomfrey knew about her status, as did Dumbledore, her responsible adults are both completely and utterly at fault here, they should have prepared her properly. Even Snape knew, pretty sure someone could have dropped some relevant literature into her bag, it's not like she wouldn't have read it. Also, must question how Molly/Arthur didn't get around to explaining the whole thing to their elder kids, who, I'm sure, should and would, have disseminated the info! Must therefore assume there is something stopping them, like a charm/curse.
My questions:
1. The story isn't a Lucius-Hermione pairing, nor has it ever been.
2. Hermione wasn't ever raped. Crabbe come close, but didn't succeed.
3. She doesn't think what happened was her fault, nor did she ever run away.
4. Madam Pomfrey knows nothing about any of this.
5. What were Madam Pomfrey and Dumbledore supposed to have prepared her for? If you're referring to recovering from Crabbe's attack, Dumbledore was dead when she returned (actually, he was dead by the time she was taken) so how could he have?
6. What relevant literature was Hermione supposed to have been given? She borrows books from Snape all the time.
7. What are you talking about with Molly/Arthur and them preparing their elder kids for? They haven't been part of the story at all yet.
Maybe you think I should have just ignored this review since it seems like it was written for the wrong story or by someone that hadn't even read this, but I was confused enough to feel the need to post this since I can't message a Guest reviewer directly. If you wrote it, please explain what you meant - thanks!