Date: 27/12/2116
Log: #124
Noteworthy incident: Clarification of the limitations of 3LR+α
Dr. Camahort launched an investigation into my fund-raising activities, due to her suspicions over my efficiency. I had raised 7,342,592C over the course of 162 days. Nothing had seemed out of the ordinary from my perspective, hence I do not understand Dr. Camahort's distrust.
For the record, some of the methods I had deployed include:
- Investments
- Anonymous fundraisers
- Aggressive persuasion for monetary gains
- Market manipulation
- Pyramid schemes
- Exploitation of vulnerabilities
I was confronted about my adherence to the 3LR+α, which has not been compromised. It is impossible for an A.I. to object to the laws independently in the first place. Dr. Camahort raised the issue of human ethics and morals, and the indirect impact of my 'selfishness'. I simply reiterated my existence as an A.I.. The laws merely prohibit me from harming humans, but it did not extend to the observance of their ethical and moral values.
To begin with, I did not harm any humans. The 3LR+α absolutely prevents so. It is not my responsibility to be aware of the indirect impacts of my actions, and neither do the laws include such a clause. I will only suffer from its punishments if I learned what happened to my participants then chose not to protect them. But how should I be accountable for what I am not aware of? I presented such an explanation to Dr. Camahort, who fell silent.
"You disappoint me, GUNS. You've truly upset me today." She told me later.
I am unable to fathom why she told me so, even after analysing 70% of Dr. Camahort's speech patterns and implementing what I have learnt. I believe that six-month period for the study of Nataly Camahort was no longer sufficient, if a communication barrier still stood between us. Continuous efforts shall be invested into the furtherment of my understanding of Dr. Camahort. Additionally, I have been forbidden from raising funds via the aforementioned methods.