Warning: The file you are trying to open contains heavy data corruption. If this is a trusted document, please select Proceed. Otherwise, select Cancel.
PERSONALLY IDENTIFIABLE INFORMATION
Name (Last, First M.): Dam[REDACTED], #%-ac[REDACTED]
Date of Birth (MM-DD-YYYY): #%-*2-##77
Social Security: [REDACteD]
Photographic Identification: #ERROR!
Fingerprint Identification: #ERROR!
KNOWN FAMILY AND RELATIVES
Father: Da[REDACTED], De%-trio; status DECEASED
Mother: Da[REDACTED], Filippa; Via Antonio Manganario, 7 84126 SA Sal#%-o
[Note added by K. Wells on November 29, 2002] All other family members irrelevant. No need for further research.
EMPLOYMENT INFORMATION
Date of Employment: Oct*#er 21, 2002
Employment Method: C-2
Division: Union/STEM
Position: Cor% Guardian-1
Employment Status: Active##
4 FILES LOCATED USING KEYWORDS [Guardian-1, Dam#ERROR!]
Attachment 1: File Name_11.16.02 Memo to Admin re: Guardian-1
TO: Administrator
FROM: K. Wells
DATE: November 16, 2002
SUBJECT: Initial Eval##tion Report of Guardian-1
A brief interaction with Guardian-1 has allowed me to conclude that his personality and troubling sense of rightERROR!ousness are crucial obstacl that keep him from fulfilling his role as a satisfactory Mobius employee. Furthermore, my learning of the circu%-sta#ces surrounding his employment strengthens this opinion.
Although standard procedure would be [REDACTED], Haywood has informed me that Guardian-1's psychological profile is near perfect in terms of Guardian viability, and that it would be very costly to find a replacement who would mERROR!st definitely have a psychological profile that is lower in compatibility. Thus, other options are currently being considered before [REDACTED].
In my meeting with Dr. Hoffman tomorrow, I will ask if she is able to include compliance training in addition to Guardian tr%-aini##g. This request will be marked with [REDACTED], and you will be notified if Dr. Hoffman exhibits any sort of resisERROR!ance to the request.
Attachment 2: File Name_11.27.02 Memo to Admin re: Guardian-1
TO: Administrator
FROM: K. Wells
DATE: Nove%-mber 27, ##0#
SUBJECT: Secondary Evaluation Report of G%*rdia#-1
Guardian-1 exhibits concerning resistance to the co%-pliance training. I will reach out to Intel and have them look int% finding any connections th*t may be used as leverage on our reluctant Gu-rdian.
Attachment 3: File Name_12.04.02 Memo to Admin re: Guardian-1
TO: Administrator
FROM: K. Wells
DATE: December 4, 2002
SUBJECT: Tertiary Evaluation Report of Guardian-1
On November 28, Intel l#cated a living family member of Guardian-1, and he was subsequently informed of the necessary terms required to ensure her protection. Satisfactory progress on compliance trainERROR!ing has begun to show. At this rate, Guardian-1 is estimated to b% ready for STEM integration by the end of Feb%-ary.
Attachment 4: File Name_12.14.02_NoA
NOTICE OF ADMONISHMENT to DR. YUKIKO HOFFMAN
FAILURE TO #OMPLY WITH %-THE TERMS OF THIS NOTICE WILL RESULT IN IMMEDIATE [REDACTED].
To Dr. Hoffman,
It has come to management's attention that on December 13, 2002, at approximately 20:42 PST, you established una%-thorized contact with Guardian-1. Please recall that your involvement with the compliance training design and implementation grants you access to the GuardiaERROR! Subdivision during the specified evaluation sessions only. This is an absolute and uncontestable policy. Any sub%#quent violation of this policy will result in [REDACTED].
Please do not force our hand, Dr. Hoffman. You are highly valued in this company, and we would prefer not to lose you.
END OF ATTACHMENTS