Warning: The file you are trying to open contains heavy data corruption. If this is a trusted document, please select Proceed. Otherwise, select Cancel.

PERSONALLY IDENTIFIABLE INFORMATION

Name (Last, First M.): ##ERROR!lace, Dakota M.

Date of Birth (MM-DD-YYYY): 06-14-2007

Social Security: [REDACTED]

Photographic Identification: #ERROR!

Fingerprint Identification: #ERROR!

KNOWN FAMILY AND RELATIVES

Father: [REDACTED], T#ERR!; status –ACCESSDENIED%

Mother: [REDACTED], Mariah; status [REDACTED] Clev#land, OH

[Note added by J. McMillan on September 23, 2012] Due to recent change in employment status, no further family detail needed.

EMPLOYMENT INFORMATION

Date of Employment: Fe#ruary %, 2011

Employment Method: A-4

Division: Union/STEM

Position: Core Candi%-atERROR!

Employment Status: Termi#ERROR!

4 FILES LOCATED USING KEYWORDS [Core, D*%-k0-a Wa%-l#*e]

Attachment 1: File Name_Core Compatibility – Test A Result Evaluation Email

Test A Result Eval – C04

M. Brockwell [mbrockwell mobiusinterna*%-om]

To: K. Wells

CC: Administrator

Sent February 21, 2011

Hi Wells,

I've looked over Dakota's res%-lts and am pleased to repoERROR!rt we might have a winner here. So far Dakota's in*%-ial scores have been a solid 10 points higher that the average of other Core candidates we've tested. Of course it's too sooERROR!n to say, and we'll need to do further testing. Test B will be ad#inistered next week, and I'll let you know what I find from those results before the end of Frida%.

Oh, and [REDACTED] has been visiting her in the playroom. Is that allowed? I know he's her f#ERROR!ther and all, but I'm not sure if we should be keep%-ng them apart.

Regards,

Brockwell

RE: Test A Result Eval – C04

K. Wells [k-ACCESSDENIED% #]

To: M. Brockwell

CC: Administrator

Sent February 21, 201%

Brockwell,

Refrain from referring to C04 by her n#me. With regards to [REDACTED], yes he is allowed to visit her.

Wells

Attachment 2: File Name_Core Compatibility – Test B Result Evaluation Email

Test B Result Eval – C04

M. Brockwell [mbrocERROR!k mobi-int_-n-_-_]

To: K. Wells

CC: Administrator

Sent F#b*uary 25, 2011

Hi Wells,

Candidate C04 underwent Test B yesterday and the results re%-ched my desk just this morning. Good news: she scored higher than average again. Test C will be administered next moERROR!nth.

As we will begin pilot STEM integration with C04 in a week, my team and I were thinking about limiting [REDACTED]'s visits. Please advise.

Regards,

B#ockwell

RE: Test B Result Eval – C04

K. Wells [k-ACCESSDENIED% #]

To: M. Brockwell

CC: Administrator

Sent FebERROR!ruary 25, 2011

How much higher did she score this time?

Regarding [REDACTED], his visits are still permitted as per our agreement.

Wells

RE: Test B Result Eval – C04

M. Brockwell [*-_#%_#- m_-#*%#_-_%*-.#o%]

To: K. WERROR!ells

CC: Administr#tor

Sent February 25, %-011

Hi Wells,

C04 scored 4 points above the average with Test B.

Regards,

Brockwell

FW: RE: Test B Result Eval – C04

K. Wells [k-ACCESSDENIED% #]

To: Administrator

Sent February %-5, 2-11

Administrator,

Per the conversation with Brockwell above, it ap%-ears that C04's deteriorating advantage over past candidates once again calls for the ne-d to search for additional CoERROR!re candidates. Right now C04 shows to be the most comp#tible with Union, but I highly recom%-end finding other options in case C04's future scores fall short.

Wells

RE: FW: RE: Test B Result Eval – C04

Administrator [ERROR!#ACCESS%-DEN-ED#ERROR! -#]

To: K. Wells

Sent February 26, 2011

Hold onto C04 for now. Tell Intel to start the search—it'll give them something to do. Tell [REDACTED] nothing of this.

Attachment 3: File Name_Brockwell Urgent Email

URGENT: Clarification on C05 Requested

M. Brockwell [mbr-#kwell mobiu%-_nter-_# ERROR!]

To: K. Wells

Sent August 17, 2011

Hi Wells,

I jusERROR!t got a notification that a C05 was approved for pilot STEM test runs. Why was I never inf#rmed that we had a C05? What about C04? Union can't run with two Cores. Why were you testing another candidate behind my back? Please clarify!

Regards,

Brockwell

RE: URGENT: Clarification on C05 Requested

K. Wells [k-ACCESSDENIED% #]

To: M. Brockwell

Sent A%-gus- 17, 2011

Brockwell,

Advise yo%-rself if using that kind of accusatory woERROR!rding is g*ing to be good for you in the long run.

I am fully awa-e that Uni#n won't operate under two Cores, which is why I have submitted a Request of Termination for C04 to HR #nd Legal. Remember that I am not reqERROR!uired to tell you anything. Union is my pr%-ject, not yours.

You may tell [REDACTED] if you like, but ask yours-lf if you want to be the bearer of that bad news. And shoERROR!uld you feel the need to step out of line and cro#d my inbox with another email like the one above, also remember tha% I can always send another Request of Terminati#n.

Wells

Attachment 4: File Name_Record of Termination for W[REDACTED], Dakota M.

OFFICIAL REC#RD OF T%-RMINATION FOR DAKOTA MARGARET W%-*L#ERROR!C%

The Request of Termination submitted on August 16, 2011 by Director Karen Wells was approved on August 18, 2011 by Director Marshall Akins.

This record hereby officiates that Dakota Margar%-t W[REDACTED], formerly Core Candidate C04, was terminated as a Mobius employee on August 21, 2011.

Method of termination was injection.

END OF ATTACHMENTS