Society…. Shall Wear Out as a Garment

This chapter will eventually be moved up with the other about Earth wearing out like a garment.


"As in the Days of Noah" and Luciferian Religion:

I'd talked about this passage in "Matthew 24 - Days of Noah" of the END TIMES I study; when addressing the "marriage" notation as related to the emergence of Luciferianism in the beliefs of the global elites. How this was connected to the Talmudic assertion that Lilith (Adam's alleged first wife) and Satan were said by Rabbinic Judaism to be the same entity.

The "legend" goes that this…. "disagreement" of Satan to Adam's "preferences" caused Satan to be "divided" now into a "binary entity" and thus "his" dilemma for the rest of earthy time becomes how to reunite these disembodied divisions of self back into one "non-binary" entity.

Sound familiar?

And so is the transgenderism / trans-humanism agenda springing from the same belief system of the Talmud, now manifest in the Luciferian religion of the global cabal; part of the "signs of the bitter end"? Is the approach to the end of time, why this agenda is manifesting itself on the world political / sociological stage?

From the vanish point of what the global cabal seems to want to believe; this appears to be part of their plan, but as far as what the Bible says? I haven't found anything that states that this is a marker for the time of the end; or at least not directly.

The irony is that the "rolling waves of seditious mobs" appears to be directly connected to this over arching belief system that has been dubbed today as "wokeism". Granted "wokeism" encompasses more than just transgenderism; although gender ideology now seems to have taken "center stage" from the race identity politics that proceeded it.

(Interesting juxtapose between the US 2021 riots and France's current (pension / inflation) protests. Also the transgender ideology that is currently being shut down in Europe; is still "fully narrative endorsed" in the US.)

Now what is going on in the US with the ideology narrative shift? I'm not sure? Being anti-racist is certainly more morally neutral of a cause than "trans women are women". Or at least it's rooted more in an identifiable truth; (i.e. racism does still exist and it is evil) as opposed to; it's biologically clear that humans with Y chromosomes aren't female.

The voices not being heard:

The thrust of this narrative itself now is starting to break down. Many of the homosexual community want nothing to do with this new trans agenda's push at children; as well as into women's spaces. The LGBQ community of "preceding" eras is quite upset with this development and does not want the trans agenda "tagging onto" the cause of their own fight. This is much in like manner, as the minority civil rights activists did not want the LGBQ tagging onto their cause.

The groups are splintering into smaller communities with their own sets of criteria. Lesbians are being told they are "transphobic" for not wanting trans "women" on their dating sites. (Which is being reported as the trend now; to such an extent that lesbians are having difficulty finding other "cis gender" lesbians.) Then gay men don't want trans persons either. Trans "women" (men who've had "bottom surgery") are basically eunuchs (they no longer have functioning genitalia) and trans "men" (women who've had attempted penis construction) don't have functioning genitalia either.

So the irony of all of this is that "run of the mill homosexuals" are now stating they are tired of "pride month" themselves. Their current stated end goal, is simply that they wanted legal equality and not to be suddenly thrust into the center of all this media narrative circus. Which socially speaking makes sense, because the homosexuals are now getting backlash from the general population; particularly in connection with what's going on in the cooperate world with "pride".

And now all manner of colors of pitchforks are emerging against the totalitarians!

As of the writing of this (07/04/2023) Budweiser and Target have lost billions of dollars due to; (at this point is more likely general public boycotts) on account of pushing trans influencers into the public eye as advertisements for "the next round of civil rights". There's grown men advertising women's sportswear to teen girls and LGBTQ+++ "pride" children's clothes with "small adult" size swimwear that's "tuck friendly" (also placed in the "tween" (tweens are kids between about 10 and 13 years old) section).

"Go woke = go broke" is the slogan of the day, as people take what little is left of the purchasing power of their dollars and go elsewhere. The "activists" are decrying this as "economic terrorism"; when basically the rest of the public (including a lot of liberals and homosexuals themselves) are simply saying: shut up; we are so over trying to be sensitive to your feelings; we don't care if you're offended; go away. As the general public hits the "ignore button" and uses their feet to carry their "shareholder capitalism" elsewhere.

Detransitioners coming out of the woodwork:

One of my recent investigations has revolved around watching interviews on YouTube of detransitioners. (People who've undergone hormone treatment and surgery to change the appearance of their birth sex, so as to look like the opposite.)

This of course has raised all sorts of issues surrounding subjects such as "cis" women's sports, bathroom and locker room use, domestic violence shelters and prisons; on top of issues of "transitioning" children!

In the wake of the destruction of "woke"; I'm finding some interesting "clues" to the unfolding (and unraveling) of this narrative, in the explanations of the ideology dissected by the detransitioners.

The term "autogynephilia" (in relation to XY chromosome individuals who either once (or still) believe they are "women") has frequently surfaced in the context of these conversations. The vast majority of these "trans women" who fall into the autogynephilia category, are middle aged biological men. Listening to the descriptions of laymen who claim this disorder as an "identity"; I'm struck by the depth of the narcissistic self idolization of those who continue to buy into this ideology.

Of which, the aspect is the predatory behavior of a great many in the (middle aged biological males with autogynephilia) group as it is impacting the teenage trans segment who are being groomed into transition. I've heard this from several 20 something and older detransitioners. One of the most disgusting things about all of this, is that these young people are being led to these "trans support" on-line groups by the medical "professionals" who are suppose to be "gender affirming" them. And thus the issue of grooming is being brought to the public eye through the stories of the detransitioners.

The other interesting caveat to the trans trend is that 30 or so years ago; most of the individuals looking to get "gender reassignment surgery" were adult men, usually in their mid 30's to early 40's. Whereas today, the explosion in those seeking medical transition is coming from middle class European descended teenage girls. Of which, here is where the alarm bells are going off for honest medial practitioners and social scientists. They recognize this as a social contagion, primarily driven by both the Internet and ideologues in educational institutions.

Then on top of this; the agenda is bolstered by governments who come down with heavy regulations on anyone who questions this trend. And THAT is the scariest part of all of this!

The real agenda, is that it's no longer about the mental health of the individual patient. It's about how much profits big pharma and the medical industrial complex can make off these kids! This is absolutely ruining families; as parents are at risk of losing custody of their children for simply saying: "Let's address my kid's mental health issues first."

Idolatry:

One of the citizen journalists I listen to, did make mention of this as a form of idolatry and it took me some thought to see the extent of truth that he spoke. But yes, I've come to the conclusion that not only is this idolatry; it's a form of profound, narcissistic self worship.

One individual, in his own description of what it's like to have autogynephilia, was rather articulate at conveying his feelings of "being a woman". It was quite enlightening, as this individual didn't seem to have any awareness of how absolutely base selfish he sounded. (Or maybe he is aware and just doesn't care?)

A lot of the comments on that interview's YouTube page were full of the insights of common people at recognizing how the obsession with the conceptualization of the "perfect woman" that drives these men to attempt to turn themselves into that idol of perfection; starkly conveys their lack of capacity to be in relationships with real women (or real men for that matter).

That was a "wow eye opener" for me; because though I was aware from my days of research papers in college, that the LGBTQ+++ population is a high consumer of mental health services; I have limited knowledge of the psychological condition of autogynephilia. Despite I'm well aware of the high rates of depression, anxiety, suicidal ideation and violent outbursts of rage among the LGBTQ++ population; the profound depth of this idolatrous narcissism in the subset of interviews about autogynephilia I've heard, was beyond the pale.

The one individual in this particular interview, explained the utter depth of tantrum the trans people who become upset over being "misgendered" display. (Ironically though, most examples I've seen of misgendered tantrums, have come from male individuals trying to be female.)

This biological male explained that the depth of the want of the desire to be thought of as female is so strong that no acknowledgement of reality (that the person is biologically male) will be tolerated. According to him; the trans individual perceives the misgendering as an assault on their very personhood. It's a denial of who they believe themselves to really be; which is perceived as a form of "murder"; thus the extreme emotional reaction. Yet for mere words (that are rooted in reality; we're not talking about racial slurs or something of similar category) to cause such extreme emotional reactions, is an obvious display of a profound break with reality.

Another detransitioner interview though, had described how forcing the "preferred pronoun" compliance turned out to be a hollow experience in the end. (It was an interesting interview.) She said that many times people who knew her before her transition to male, were so used to calling her "she"; that they honestly had pretty consistent pronoun slips. Then when those who remembered the preferred pronoun would use it; she felt that they were only doing it because she requested them to; not because they actually perceived her a male.

Lucifer and Eve?

In my study Theory on Angels, Ghosts and Extraterrestrial Life I talked about the fall of Lucifer related to Adam. (Chapter 9 - Satan part 2) As I contemplate this further; I'm wondering if the fall of Lucifer was more connected to Eve?

Genesis says that Eve was created from Adam because there was no helpmeet found for him. So the question of the idea of Lucifer being "Lilith" does present an interesting juxtapose here. Not that God had assigned Lucifer as "Lilith"; but had Lucifer sought to be the helpmeet for Adam? (Scripture never directly indicates that this was the case; that I'm aware of.)

And of course not being an entity that possessed the capacity for creative thought; Lucifer would not have understood what being Adam's helpmeet meant. Also (Lucifer) making an assumption here too, that Adam created in God's image, would have been "above" the reproductive necessity of the mere beasts. Or at least that seems a reasonable conclusion Lucifer could draw. After all, the animals were told to be fruitful and multiply before Adam was ever created. (End of the 5th day.)

Which this is kind of comical, if that's what Lucifer assumed upon Adam being created in God's image; that God would have "pulled a fast one" on Lucifer. Thus if there is any truth to the conceptualization of "Lilith"; Adam's helper would have been what ever of conceptualization was out of Lucifer's own observations. Which could only be extrapolated out of Adam's relationship to God; as the only observable possibility of "helper" Lucifer had at that point, was the example of Adam to God. Although Lucifer had to have noticed that God was already a Triune entity and Adam was not.

Which could be what lead Lucifer to believe he should rule over Adam? (This demonstrated example of God's headship over man.) So did Lucifer fall at the point Eve was created because the "truth solidified" was manifest as no authority came between God and His human creation(s)? Or of the confusion (disgust or both) Lucifer had of now knowing God was to have those made in His image to produce offspring using the same process that animals did? Is it of no surprise that sexual sin carries the greatest weight of moral disgust. After all, "moral provisions" have been made for acts such as killing criminals, stealing food, or lying to protect the innocent from tyranny.

So is transgender ideology part of the "end game"? I don't have a definitive answer to that; but it does make sense that it would be. All this nonsense currently going on, about binary vs non-binary and transgenderism would (and does) fit into the paradigm of the Luciferian religion.

Also, if Eve was the initial object of jealousy; it would make sense that the primary target of this transgender social contagion would ultimately come to be teenage girls. The first wave of transgenderism were adult males starting back in the 1960's; whose numbers were by far fewer. But the transgender teenage girl is a phenomena that has only become "socially popular" within the past about 5 years.

Now Romans 1:26 makes a comment about women in regards to lesbianism; but those couple of verses in Romans don't specify that this particular behavioral phenomena began with women. We know of traditional statistics that the proportions of male homosexuals to female homosexuals is 3 to 1. (For every one lesbian is three gay men.) Also lesbians tended to "come out of the closet" after their male counterparts did. And even today there is a huge divide in the LGBTQ++ community over "cis gender" lesbians who reject trans "women".

Psychiatry says there is a socio-developmental component to this 3 to 1 statistic. That component (as it pertains to male homosexuals) is related to both fathers being in the home; as well as the quality of the father figure in the home. Which also makes sense that as the basic family structure breaks down across civilizations; other social issues grow in prevalence. Homosexuality isn't the only social issue on the rise. General promiscuity, crime and actually domestic violence are on the increase too. Children in homes that contain both biological parents are statistically less likely to be abused; and across the spectrum of types of abuse too.

So yes, as we see human civilization in general deteriorate; "the earth shall wear out like a garment" certainly appears to take on a social application too.