Report 0.13VTMagnus Institute - Artefact Storage Division
Report on Marine Landscape Painting
Date: [XXXX] Investigator: Helen Supervisor: Elias Bouchard

I. Artefact Identification

A. Codename: Deep Sea Canvas
B. Classification: Vast Artefact
C. Origin: Unknown
D. Previous Owner/Incident: Danny Nutter

II. Physical Description

The Deep Sea Canvas stands as a testament to the overwhelming expanse of the Vast. This painting, initially unimposing in appearance, captures an infinite stretch of abyssal waters that, upon closer examination, draws individuals into a mesmerizing dance with the concept of boundlessness. Appears larger than it is.
Project Status:
Be cautious. May invoke seasickness if ill-prepared.

III. Anomalies and Safety Measures

Anomalies:
A. Seasickness: Observers report a disorienting sensation of vertigo or seasickness
B. Abyssal Intrusion: Prolonged observation tends to induce a subtle but profound psychological impact, as if the viewer is being drawn into the infinite depths depicted within the mural.
C. Seashell Opera: Individuals may report hearing the sound of distant waves, as if pressing a shell to their ears.

Safety Measures:
A. Limited Exposure: Individuals, particularly those susceptible to the influence of the Vast, should avoid prolonged contemplation.

IV. Observations and Effects

A. Disorientation: Observers may exhibit signs of momentary disorientation after engaging.
B. Vast Influence: Prolonged exposure might lead to a heightened sensitivity to the vastness of open spaces, triggering anxiety or a sense of existential discomfort.

V. Containment and Surveillance

A. Not particularly dangerous. Worth further observation. Researcher has subdued the influence and hung it up in a place where her colleagues will see it on occasion for purposes of further observation.

VI. Recommendations and Conclusions

A. Ongoing Evaluation: Regularly monitor individuals.

VII. Approval and Acknowledgment

A. Submitted By: HelenX
B. Approved By: Elias BouchardX

Note: This report is subject to ongoing investigation, and updates will be provided as new information becomes available.

VIII. Final Notes

In the vast and diverse tapestry of anomalies within the Institute's collection, the Deep Sea Canvas reveals itself as a subtle yet powerful testament to the primal fear of boundless waters. As the investigation unfolds, the Deep Sea Canvas beckons not only with the allure of its endless waters but also with the psychological abyss it mirrors within the human psyche.

Report 1.7SUMagnus Institute - Artefact Storage Division
Report on Stained Shot Glass
Date: [XXXX] Investigator: Helen Supervisor: Elias Bouchard

I. Artefact Identification

A. Codename: The BloodShot
B. Classification: Slaughter Artefact
C. Origin: Unknown
D. Previous Owner/Incident: Killian McCracken

II. Physical Description

The BloodShot is a garish shot glass, appearing ordinary in all aspects except for a red staining inside the glass. Despite efforts to clean it, the staining proves resilient.

Project Status:
Exercise extreme caution to prevent inadvertent exposure. This artefact has shown an ability to incite violent tendencies.

III. Anomalies and Safety Measures

Anomalies:
A. Aggressive Instigation: Individuals consuming liquids from the shot glass report heightened feelings of aggression and a propensity for violent behavior.
B. Haunting Paranoia: Faint, indiscernible whispers emanate from the shot glass, causing paranoia and contributing to a sense of impending threat.
C. Not Best-By: Anything drunk from it tastes rancid and faintly of rust.

Safety Measures:
A. Restricted Usage: Consuming any substance from it is strictly prohibited.
C. Containment Procedures: Extreme caution is necessary when handling. Only handle when properly hydrated, and do not bring any liquids in close proximity.

IV. Containment and Surveillance

A. Containment Protocol:
Limit access. Store in a box.

B. Potential for Destruction:
Evaluate the feasibility of destroying the Bloodshot Vessel to neutralize its influence. It poses a storage hazard and is best kept separate from employees. It's also gross. Recommend to destroy, because it's gross.

C. Surveillance and Monitoring:
Monitor access and potential response to violent influence.

V. Recommendations and Conclusions

A. Destroy

VI. Approval and Acknowledgment

A. Submitted By: HelenX
B. Approved By: Elias BouchardX

Note: This report is subject to ongoing investigation, and updates will be provided as new information becomes available.

VII. Final Notes:

The Bloodshot Vessel, ensconced in its deceptive simplicity, harbors a malevolence that transcends its unpretentious exterior. Its appearance, unremarkable to the casual observer, serves as a cunning disguise for the profound darkness it conceals. This seemingly innocuous shot glass, tinged with a subtle yet ominous red hue, is a vessel of turmoil and aggression.
The very notion of indulging in a substance from the BloodShot evokes a visceral distaste, as if the glass itself carries the stain of the violence it could incite.
The subtle, phantom whispers that emanate from the glass, a siren song of impending aggression, only intensify the investigator's aversion. It poses tangible risk due to its marked association with the Slaughter.
In the grand tapestry of the Magnus Institute's artefact collection, the BloodShot stands out not for its grandiosity but for the repugnance it elicits. It is a testament to the insidious nature of the entities that even the most unassuming objects can harbor a darkness that demands careful consideration and a vigilant containment strategy. The researcher's journey into the heart of this artefact is marked not only by professional diligence but by a personal distaste for the potential havoc it may wreak upon those unfortunate enough to come into contact with its tainted influence.

Report 3.2FDMagnus Institute - Artefact Storage Division
Report on Scorched Garden Shears
Date: [XXXX] Investigator: Helen Supervisor: Elias Bouchard

I. Artefact Identification

A. Codename: Ashen Shears
B. Classification: Desolation Artefact, potential association with Lonely
C. Origin: Unknown
D. Previous Owner/Incident: Ringo Holden

II. Physical Description

The Ashen Shears are a pair of garden shears with prominent scorch marks staining its blades. While the blades retain sharpness, their intended purpose remains ambiguous, as they don't appear suitable for conventional gardening tasks.

Project Status:
Caution is advised to prevent accidental exposure to this artifact.

III. Anomalies and Safety Measures

Anomalies:
A. Desolate Touch: It exudes an aura suggestive of desolation, captivating those in proximity and instilling a yearning for the scorching solitude it represents.
B. Identity Erosion: Prolonged exposure to it prompts a disintegration of one's sense of self, causing a profound disconnection from personal identity.
C. Immunity to Conventional Damage: Attempts to damage or dispose of it result in its restoration to an undamaged state, hinting at an inherent resilience to conventional removal methods.

Safety Measures:
A. Non-engagement: The Ashen Shears should not be utilized or handled under any circumstances. Secured containment is paramount.
B. Containment Procedures: Extreme caution is advised during handling, with containment specialists utilizing protective gear for retrieval and secure containment.

Observed Effects:
A. Pervasive sense of desolation among affected individuals.
B. Heightened inclination towards self-isolation leading to extended periods of solitude.

IV. Containment and Surveillance

A. Containment Protocol:
Secure Ashen Shears within a specially consecrated containment chamber to mitigate its desolation-inducing influence.
Limit access to authorized personnel only.

B. Potential for Destruction:
Evaluate the viability of destroying Ashen Shears to neutralize its influence. Given its potential hazards, consider keeping it isolated from other artifacts.

C. Surveillance and Monitoring:
Establish a robust surveillance protocol to monitor individuals exposed to Ashen Shears for any signs of prolonged desolation or identity erosion.

V. Recommendations and Conclusions

A. Containment is Priority: Given its potent influence, continued secure containment is the primary recommendation.
B. Watch

VI. Approval and Acknowledgment

A. Submitted By: HelenX
B. Approved By: Elias BouchardX

Note: This report is subject to ongoing investigation, and updates will be provided as new information becomes available.

VII. Final Notes:

May provide future use.

Report 2.9SRMagnus Institute - Artefact Storage Division
Report on Strange Mirror
Date: [XXXX] Investigator: Helen Supervisor: Elias Bouchard

I. Artefact Identification
A. Codename: The Glass Skin
B. Classification: Stranger Artefact
C. Origin: Unknown
D. Previous Owner/Incident: Miranda Thaughne

II. Physical Description

The Glass Skin is a circus mirror, standing approximately six feet tall and three feet wide. Its surface is unnaturally pristine, and despite its reflective nature, it distorts the appearance of those who gaze into it in peculiar and disconcerting ways. One can almost forget what they thought they looked like.

Project Status:
Exercise extreme caution to prevent inadvertent exposure. This artefact has shown an ability to manipulate perceptions.

III. Anomalies and Safety Measures

Anomalies:
A. Distorted Reflections: Individuals viewing themselves in the Glass Skin experience a profound alteration in their appearance, leading to a disassociation from their perceived identity.
B. Shape-shifting: The mirror has displayed the ability to create illusions of familiar faces that do not correspond to the true appearance of the observer, causing a sense of unease and confusion.
C. Memory Fragmentation: Recollections tied to the mirror's influence may become unreliable, fostering a sense of alienation from one's own past experiences.

Safety Measures:
A. Restricted Viewing: Directly looking into the Glass Skin is strictly prohibited.
B. Isolation Protocol: Individuals exposed to its effects should be quarantined and assessed for any prolonged psychological effects.
C. Containment Procedures: Artefact stored with a similar mirror of an Observing nature.

IV. Containment and Surveillance

A. Containment Protocol:
Artefact stored with a similar mirror of an Observing nature.
B. Potential for Destruction:
Not yet necessary.
C. Surveillance and Monitoring:
Monitor individuals who have interacted with the artefact.

V. Recommendations and Conclusions

A. Neutral Containment Recommended
B. Watch

VI. Approval and Acknowledgment

A. Submitted By: HelenX
B. Approved By: Elias BouchardX

Note: This report is subject to ongoing investigation, and updates will be provided as new information becomes available.

VII. Final Notes:

Further observation necessary.